Direct answer: how many candlestick patterns are there in forex?
There is no universally agreed single number of candlestick patterns in forex. The reason is simple: “candlestick pattern” is not one standardized mathematical object. Different charting communities and educators define patterns with different entry/exit rules (or with no trading rules), different levels of strictness, and different scope of what counts as a distinct pattern. As a result, any number you see online is usually tied to a specific author’s classification scheme, not to an absolute total for forex.
A more verifiable way to answer the question is to treat “how many” as “how many distinct patterns exist within a chosen definition set.” If you choose a particular list (for example, the set of patterns in one textbook or tool), then the count for that list is well-defined. Across lists, the counts differ.
How this “count” works in practice
Candlesticks describe price behavior using a small set of geometric features for each time period: the open price, the close price, the high, and the low. Common pattern definitions then combine multiple candlesticks and require conditions such as:
- Candle body direction (bullish vs. bearish) based on close relative to open.
- Candle size comparisons (for example, one body larger than another).
- Shadow (wick) characteristics, such as long upper shadow or long lower shadow.
- Relative placement, such as a close near the top of the range.
- Multi-candle sequences with ordering rules (what comes first, what must be bigger or smaller).
Because these requirements can be defined loosely or strictly, the number of “patterns” in a list can expand quickly. For example, a broad definition might treat a family of shapes as one pattern, while a stricter definition might split them into multiple variations.
Example checks and why lists differ
If you want a more independently checkable answer than a single global number, use two comparison tests:
-
Definition test: Do the pattern rules specify candle-shape criteria clearly (body direction, relative wick lengths, and ordering)? If not, two sources may both claim “this is a pattern,” but they may mean different things by “pattern.”
-
Granularity test: Does the list include variations (for example, slightly different wick-length or body-size thresholds), or does it group variants under one name? More granularity typically increases the count.
Under these tests, two pattern catalogs can legitimately produce different totals even when they use the same underlying candle anatomy. The underlying candle features are consistent, but the pattern boundaries are not.
Limitations and what you can verify
This topic does not have a single authoritative total because pattern counting depends on human-defined naming and inclusion rules. That means:
- You can verify that candlestick anatomy has a fixed set of observable measurements (open, high, low, close) for each candle.
- You can verify whether a specific named pattern matches a specific rule set—by checking whether candles meet the criteria.
- You cannot verify a claim like “there are exactly N candlestick patterns in forex” without also accepting the exact definition set used to produce N.
In other words, the uncertainty is about classification, not about what a candlestick shows.